Nothing beats a simple, well updated web site. And nothing beats a smear campaign than a counter-smear paint brush that fills in the details of a blurred picture created by smear artists.
The Obama campaign has found a great way of not just correcting the distortions about him, but to expose the names and history behind those who it claims are behind the smears.
Running off the main My.BarackOmama.com site, the Fight the Smears page is filled with the scurrilous emails, and sentences quoted out of context or distorted, with the correction or proof. No wonder he’s often called the Web 2.0 candidate, with a range of new media channels, including a well fed blog, Twittering and a text-message option for those who want to be the first to know his VP pick.
Web sites like AgainstObama.com (like AgainstHillary.com) crop up every few weeks, as do negative ads from McCain. But a YouTube video slam and a web site isn’t half as effective as the cumulative force of the web 2.0 counter smear machine –powered by facts.
Controversy demands source variety. The Olympics, like war, is poorer when the variety is constrained by commercial or political decree.
But I never realized how an exclusive sponsorship at the Olympics could be a bad strategic move. Rohit Bhargava
My fellow blogger, Len Gutman at
The term came into
Johnston was captured in Gaza, and freed last year. He had a campaign going, and now a
Tissanayagam wasn’t carrying a camera into the warzone. The ‘risky business’ he engaged in? Managing a web site. That’s right, my friends, he is the sort of new media journalist that doesn’t get covered by new media journalism. He’s 161 days in detention, and counting.
“One thing I love about Benetton: it never knows when to leave well enough alone.”
Advertising Age’s Bob Garfield