“This decade’s over. Let’s get a better one going”
Reveler, David Fraley, in Las Vegas
“AT&T latest to end sponsorship of Tiger Woods”
“This decade’s over. Let’s get a better one going”
“AT&T latest to end sponsorship of Tiger Woods”
On to the second C I talk about: the wisdom of the crowds concept, and the belief that “the people formerly known as incompetent” can actually make great contributions.
I see this in organizations where everyone may not be a ‘communicator’ but there are many who can be Antennas, Filters or Connectors.
The best examples of crowd sourcing tend to be in journalism. Two great sites come to mind:
However, in two other very different areas we see it in action:
Bottom line: People will contribute their ideas and when they do it is up to someone in the organization to recognize it, map it, use it.
This is about the first of the 4Cs –the power (and the potential) to collaborate.
Like you, I occasionally come across people who find it hard to work in the same sand box. But the good thing is these people and these instances are few and far between.
They are typically suspicious of newbies, protective of their work (or job description), or have an inflated opinion of their contribution to the big picture. (Someone down the road handed them the biggest crayon in the box, and they’re still holding onto it!)
But just looking around, we see plenty of examples and tools that enable collaboration. My favorite examples are how easy it is to work together on a document, via a wiki such as WetPaint, or a sharing tool such as Google docs.
Collaboration is much more than the ‘two heads are better than one’ concept, even though that’s at its core. It’s not something that only came about with the Facebook generation, either.
Two very different examples:
1. Butterflies:
I recall a project called Journey North that began somewhere in 2002. One of the collaborative projects involved students from Canada, the U.S. and Mexico collaborating on collecting data to track the journey of the Monarch butterfly. Some 300,000 students from 6,000 schools have taken part in this!
2. Media coverage
In 2008, for four days gunmen took over and terrorised hotels and other building sin the heart of Mumbai, India. Cell phone networks were overloaded, media were unable to get close to the shootings, and the bets reports were coming via text messages and via Twitter.
Within minutes, a journalism professor Sree Sreenivasan from Columbia University pulled together a radio show via a blog platform called BlogTalkRadio to cover the event using Mumbai-based media people, experts on Homeland Security and others.
So whether it is GoogleWave today, or BlogTalkRadio last year, we know that we all have the collaborative gene in us. The organizations we work for often urge us to be involved. In the past that has meant ‘anything but PR/marketing, corporate communications’ since they employed special people for that. Today, many employers —and government–realize that unless they tap into the collective brainpower through collaborative policies and tools, they could be left behind.
It’s been a totally unpredictable year for me, as I am sure it was for you.
While I wanted to say Thank You to my readers, friends and family, former colleagues at ASU, I also wanted to share with all of you the core of what I believe in when it comes to the intersection of traditional and new media.
I call it the Four Cs. I realize there may be five, or seven. But think of these as four lenses through which you could clarify what’s happening to marketing, PR, media and advertising. It was a result of a mixed year.
So as we close out on 2009, I plan to condense the four things that I have learned. The starting Monday, I will cover them:
Collaboration. Crowd-sourcing. Content Curation. Community.
I hope they are valuable. Enjoy!
“Easily mistaken for a universal remote, the Pepper Pad was really just a Linux-based mobile computer … that was purported to make it easy to operate from non-traditional work spaces (like poolside or in your favorite armchair).”
“I’m going on record and saying it –Hewlett Packard computers are racist.”
“We believe that the camera might have difficulty “seeing” contrast in conditions where there is insufficient foreground lighting.”
“We invite you to connect with us on the discussion boards and forums here on The Next Bench or on Twitter at @HP_PC.”
“Meanwhile, the tech-bloggers trembled all year at (as yet unfulfilled) rumors of an Apple tablet.”
When I talk to people about why video can be a powerful tool, it’s easy to oversimplify and talk about producing in-house vlogs. But if you look at the variations, you’ll see they could range from citizen journalism submissions, to ‘anonymous’ viral stories, to damaging claims, to pranks. Hers are three uses of video that can make or break a brand’s reputation.
These two will go down in the books as the best and worst of how video mined social media in 2009.
Samsung created this contrived piece for Smart Led technology:
Hewlett Packard, on the other hand is at the receiving end, responding to this direct, damaging claim about its facial tracking technology in its web cams
And speaking of being at the receiving end, here’s how another brand faced the music, so to speak. My all time favorite this year.
What are your most memorable videos for 2009? Share a link with my readers, and us why video matters.
Is this one of the worst puns, or what?
“However Mr. Jobs, now that you got into this mess …You are the only person who can get our APPS ‘everywhere.’ despite the fact that their MAPS have blanketed the country.
“And, the warning? Don’t read too many blog posts like this.”
“Living Stories,”
“Our role is actually stronger than ever, because we are more than just a magazine … to promote travel around the state.”
“When you’re using search engines, you’ve got to be diligent. You can’t trust that just because it’s Number 2 or Number 1, it really is…”
“Industry Listening Program”