Chlorox: When ads tell stories

I was fascinated by the execution of the Chlorox ad. See it here.

It’s a prduct message seen through the life of several generations. We see the ‘machines’ (the fridge, car, speakers, treadmill) come in and out of life as the product is still central to the clothes washing routine. The product, the bottle of Chlrorox, is always in the same spot, and deliberately not in your face.

The best advertising is always a story. No matter what special effects we employ, the simple stories communicate the most. It’s the ultimate weapon that can fight short attention spans and clutter.

Continue reading

Ad agencies must change (and stop bashing each other)

Not too very far from where I sit, the 4A’s conference is coming to a close. It’s a very warm day in Scottsdale, and many agency heads are probably steaming –after taking in Euro RSCG Ron Berger’s address.

But we have to take that in the context of the huge asteroid, the Net, heading in the direction of the agency world. Consider some of the topics of the conference:

"The agency’s role in marketing accountability" and
"Kick ass creative in the digital world" or
"compensation models" or
"How and why the ad agency business model must change."

Interestingly, this management conference (for CEO’s) is titled "ROI: Return on ideas. Return on Involvement. Return on Investment."

Tony Hopp, the incoming chair bemoaned negativity always seemed to ooze out of advertising conferences — a la the ‘death of the 30 second commercial.’ I suppose he was not-so subtly telling outgoing chair that trashing Martin Sorell and the others in the business was not the kind of thing the industry wanted to be known for. "Are we as an industry too self absorbed?" he asked rhetorically.

I hope Hopp’s reign brings in a new ROI: is a return on inspiration, as agencies struggle with change.

Continue reading

Verizon’s advertising faux pas

The story of sidewalk advertising by Verizon reminds me of IBM’s famous use of ‘Peace, love and Linux’ campaign in 2001 using sidewalk chalk. When will companies learn that you can’t take ‘guerilla’ tactics to public places and not get rapped on your knuckles.

Or maybe, I am missing the point entirely –the piurpose of such a move may be to get rapped on your knuckles, and thereby get more stories on the campaign in circulation. IBM’s chalk tactic was deemed graffiti. MSN, went beyond the sidewalk and stuck cutouts of butterflies.

Verizon’s fine of $1,050 is like loose change in a campaign warchest. Someday someone will compute that the Google juice gained from seven infractions (fined at the rate of $150 each), may be well worth doing it many times over. Not to be atempted in San Francisco, for sure. IBM was fined over a $100,000, four years ago.

Continue reading

Replace consumer with ‘engager’ –or gatekeeper?

Mike Swenson’s comment opens up a window into the world of how the PR world is addressing the famously empowered consumer. His comment on the ‘manifesto’ on Joseph Jaffe’s blog, got me thinking. The consumer with more power, isn’t really a new concept. (Remember the ‘prosumer?’) The consumer has always been more than a person with a fat wallet. Just to dwell on Toffler’s prediction for a moment, he envisioned an active consumer, not a passive one. IMHO, this active consumer is more than an engager. Sure we would configure our own sneakers, and be our own travel agents but there’s another side of the control revolution: to control what we hear and watch. We can be brutal gatekeepers, and at other times, welcome hosts.

I don’t want to know what Fox TV has to say on Channel 10 because it’s all special effects and tabloid news. That channel at home is non-existent; we skip past it so fast, it’s almost funny. I don’t see most of the ads online because I minimize or click past anything that smacks of interruption marketing. But I do listen to what columnists and companies have to say via newsletters and podcasts to which I subscribe; I don’t object to the pitch of the ads in magazines because to a certain extent, I have imposed a filter (buying only the ones that I plan to read) and feel safe to let them in.

Continue reading

Bloggers in Singapore censored. What will the neighbors think?

What’s the government of Singapore thinking, taking a leaf from it’s big neighbor that has a policy about banned words in blogs, and shuts down other dissident blogs?

News just out: that there’s a ‘temporary ban’ on political blogs with the elections around the corner. I like to see how the BBC and others cover this one, after the coverage Google and MSN got about their filtering, especially the former’s ‘hard compromise‘  with China.

Continue reading

New York Times –why layout matters

Amazing new look for the Times. Suddenly it feels like a paper again. I know, I know, it’s supposed to be an un-paper, in our all-things-digital age. But some of us are still attached to printed products –or the analog experience of the digital counterparts– even though we love our RSS.

I used to always wonder whhat’s so hard about making the lead story look like a lead, and to make the photographs seem less like thumbnails.Shoving all the excess NYTimes.com nav links to the bottom deinitely reduces the clutter.

In the offline world layout is huge. Ever been to a grocery store after it’s been remodelled? It just ruins your internal gps system. My local library switched the orientation of the checkout desks, and terminals, and it’s thrown a lot of people off. Design matters. Now if only NPR could do something about it’s eighties layout…

Continue reading

Consumer generated advertising has mixed results

In this consumer-in-the-driving seat world of marketing, the idea of getting consumers to design their own ads is a facinating one whose time has come and gone and come again. Even before the Net, I recall (somewhere in London, i believe) a tactic where McDonald’s allowed customers to design their own coupon. Hand drawn ones.

More recently, Converse has been solicting user content –not commercials, it says, but ‘films.’ That’s a 24-second film, which um, sounds like a commercial, to me. Just add an intro and end frame. There’s more about this on Cory Confetti’s blog, User Generated, about an antiperspirant ad for Ban, and user generated commercials.

So this story about Chevy Taho, in the New York Times, adds a new twist. When a company opens itself up to consumer ‘feedback’ of this nature, albeit ads, it has to expect opinions from all kinds of people –customers and those who aren’t exactly fans. The rules on the Chevy site (co-branded with The Apprentice) specify that the submitted ad must contain 5 or more clips from what has been provided. But still that leave enough room for people to express themselved.

Jackie Huba and Ben McConnell, the very interesting Church of the Customer folks, aptly call this a game, not real UGC. Why play this game and ask customers to do the work that you anyway pay an ad agency? One word: engagement. Marketers have grown weary of eyeballs. They want customers to take the reigns –even of their creative. Agencies must love it –creating advertising that solicits advertising.

Continue reading

United Airline’s miscommunication can cost ya

I used to root for United airlines a lot, because of
some great experiences flying Ted from Phoenix and, of course for the domestic leg of a long haul
to Asia every 2 years. When United filed for bankruptcy, I
even switched from Southwest, my company’s preference, just because some of us
love the idea of having more choices…

Today that changed. Just beause someone forgot to
tell me (and my 81 year old mother) that United had a new policy about baggage
weight. Oh well, maybe the economy class isn’t of much significance. I write a
lot about employee communication and internal branding, and this was a case to
behold. Pains me to write about this, but I would like to save some poor
international traveler some grief.

We dropped off my mother at Phoenix airport, on a return flight to Sri Lanka. The ticket agent informed us that we would have to
pay $25 each for both her check-in bags since they were each over 50 pounds
allowance. This was odd. Just last evening, doing a final check, calling
United’s 800 number, I went through the details. Stopovers: Phoenix, Lax, Narita, Singapore, Colombo:
all confirmed. Passenger assistance, confirmed. The final thing I asked was if
the baggage allowance was the same as when she came in –70 pounds. The agent
paused, and then said yes, as this was  an international ticket. I knew
this had to be fine as she had arrived in December last year with bags that
were well over 50 pounds, each. Also, I flew United to Lax last July and
returned in August with with two sixty-five to seventy pound seventy pound
bags. But as frequent fliers always do, we ask the same old questions from the
agent on the phone, just to be sure. To us, they are the airline. Not the ads.
Not the brochures, but the invisible person thousands of miles away who give
you the feeling that everything is ok when you put down the phone.

But all was not Ok when I placed that call.

Mysteriously, United had changed its baggage
policy and not communicated this to us.

I have more back up: Two weeks ago, I stopped at Sky
harbor airport to check on my mom’s ticket as she had confirmed return dates
with a travel agent in Sri Lanka after she got here, and this was not reflected on
her ticket. The agent kindly printed me the new return itinerary, and said even
this was not necassary as her details were all updated in the system. Then too,
I asked how much baggage allowance, and got the same answer: seventy pounds.
Yes, all was OK when I left the building.

This morning, when I brought this to the attention of the counter agent, he
would have none of it, and started getting rude. I was hit with the famous
‘company policy’ stuff, and the fact that all airlines now only allowed 50
pounds. (He may be right. But FYI: we also dropped off someone last evening catching a British Airways flight, and her
bags were 70 pounds each. The web site confirms this. I told him this, but it surely did not help the situation.*)

When I said this was United’s mistake –giving me the
wrong information on the phone, he got rude and said he could not deal with me
anymore –asking my mother to go and stand at the next counter to be served by
someone else. She’s 81 years old, for goodness sake. This was not the way I
wanted her to leave the country. I can be sure she will not be on United the next
time.

I did check this afternoon, and sure, that ‘policy’ is on the United web
site. But does that become the de facto B-to-C communication channel? Is
everyone who flies an airline suposed to hop over to their web site and check
all the details of the flight, just in case the nice lady on the phone got it
wrong? What if you were to apply this to another industry? What if you had a
travel agent to book you into the MGM in Vegas and when you get there, the
person at the counter tells you that your room now costs fifty bucks more
because of a company policy your travel agent hadn’t been alerted to? What if
you rented a car from Avis for a weekend at a certain cost (quoted on the phone)
and when you brought the car back on Sunday, you were slapped with an extra
charge for not getting the car washed –a new policy only posted on the company
web site? Should you feel guilty for not having checked the Avis web site
sometime between Friday and Sunday?

My stand on all this is simple: the person
on the phone is the final frontier. The true face of the company. Undermine
him/her and what you have left is an empty shell. We travel with, dine in, buy
from or subscribe to brands because of the people within. (The people who
listen, that is) not the text on the pOlicy page of the web site.

My mom’s on the long flight right
now. Hope she experiences an ounce of the ‘friendly skies’ hospitality –not
available on the ground, as of this morning, here in Phoenix.

*I can go on about the chap at the counter
(and how there was disagreement with the other staff about how much to charge
us) but that is not the purpose of this post.

Continue reading

Three ads: Evian, ChildCare India, and World Water Day

Execution of a message is what makes the idea memorable.

WATER. I had this sent to me from a friend, Lalith Dassenaike, who works at Cigar, an organization that deals in water management and sustainable development, among other things. It’s a long commercial for Evian, that takes a different look at the lifecycle of a drop of water.

CHILDCARE. This execution about a different kind of childcare, demonstrates an interesting use of outdoor messaging by Grey Worldwide, Mumbai.

If you have any fine examples of how great execution makes a simple idea stand out, please send it my way.

WATER. , again. For World Water Day, 2006, Green Belgium placed these stickers inside wash basins of cinemas, restaurants, pubs etc in Belgium and Mexico City. The stickers photographs of a child’s face, placed in such a way that his mouth is exactly positioned where the water goes down the sink. You get the idea… See story here.

Continue reading

The advertising-meets technology headache. PVR’s and declining TV audiences

What are advertisers thinking? Or tearing their hair about? The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) is a body of more than 350 members, and this includes all the brand names that advertise nationally and globally.

Of about twenty committees, almost all of them list as ‘prevalent topics’ things like media and audience measurement, ROI, Integrated Marketing Communications, optimization, addressable TV, and PVR’s (personal video recorders.)

As can be expected, the ‘advertising’ committee and the ‘new technologies’ committee appear very keen on the issues of audience measurement, optimization, and TiVo. So if you were to read between the bullet points, you can see that the migration of advertising from the mainstream media to online opens up a lot of concerns, and a brand new set of needs.

I thought it was interesting that while TiVo was mentioned many times, another brand that is causing a lot of ripples in Madison Avenue and Hollywood was not mentioned: iTunes. Nor was YouTube, or MySpace. Hmmm.

But that is not to say they are not concerned. I clicked around and found that the new tech committee is in fact keeping an open ear for how other brands –I mean issues— such as Google, AOL, and Novartis can shed some light. The latter does not have a migraine-inducing ‘platform’ like PVRs or RSS, but the ANA was interested in the use of an ‘advergame’ called Zone Quest. In case you are wondering, Zone Quest is described as “a fun way to remind you of the importance of making healthy lifestyle choices to keep your blood pressure ‘in the zone’.”

Why am I interested in this? I come across tons of stories that deal with how poorly advertisers are responding to the emerging media, and how unprepared they are to meet the onslaught of the technologies arriving every day that circumvent advertising. They are indeed turning the ship around, allocating large portions of theie media budgets to online strategies. They are quite miffed by TV, and are ‘very dissatisfied’ with upfronts. This was from a survey of ANA members in 2004.

Imagine what they must think two years later…

Continue reading