Needed: digital currency for online content

A plan by Disney to offer free TV content online is a glimpse the where advertising could get innovative. As I had been speculating, ad-supported content is coming to streaming and downloadble media, but it should not mimic the way advertising works in television. Faced with ad-killing DVR other time-shifting technologies, the only way to counter it is with technology, but not technology that punishes viewers, or technology that primarily interrupts content.

For the moment, according to Disney’s plan, interruption is not being addressed at all. Disney says "viewers will be able to pause and move between ‘chapters’ in an episode but will not be able to skip ads that are technically embedded."

Technically hardwiring ads is what TV did, and see how crippled that model is. Content sites should embed something we can never have enough of: choices. When a program break comes up, viewers should have the choice of earning credits for viewing the ad, or bypassing the ad but providing some feedback (taking a poll, commenting on the program etc). Then they could have a further incentive thrown in, to go back to the ad and watch it if they wished, to top up their credits even more. These credits could be then used to buy other content available online and not on regular TV. Or maybe previous episodes a viewer may have missed.

I’m talking of advertising being turned on its head, making it a currency, not an annoying bathroom break. Some third party vendor is surely going to come up with this currency system for many other online program interactions. A currency that could be banked and used like air miles. The point is, viewers and consumers (not marketers nor the media) are the final arbiters of the world’s most desired currency: attention.

Many agencies still dont realize that this is the area where creativity is in short supply. If they don’t get in and get creative, someone like iTunes or Google will.

Continue reading

The new media universe map from Marcom Interactive

There is this neat map of the new media universe, from Marcom Interactive. They call it the ‘modern mediasphere.’ You can see it here.

It sure looks interconnected (given the shapes assigned to each medium and technology) but something is odd. In the schematic they lay out, mobile phones and camera phones etc lie on the periphery (how odd is this?) and with some overlap, blogs, wikis and podcasts etc are pushed to the center of this universe. ‘Streaming news’ is close to TV, and not radio –both of which are not in the vicinity of mobile phones.

The neat thing, though, is the ability to turn each of the 3 sections on and off.

Continue reading

Social media and social networks: will marketers show some respect?

You know interest in social networks is peaking, when companies like eBay get back into the game. eBay has just announced an investment in MeetUp. Steve Rubel observes that the marketing side of social networks will have to respect the fact that consumers will not want to be marketed to.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T. Such a rare ingredient in much of today’s campaigns. Yes, if advertising is to hitch a ride on social hubs such as YouTube, Myspace, LinkedIn, UpMyStreet etc companies must first find ways to respect what’s going on in that arena, and not simply use it as another convenient handle on which to hang their brand.

They need to consider the WHAT before thinking of the HOW. Which also applies to social media such a sblogs, podcasts.

Shel Holtz puts it better: they should first have something to say before picking up the next cool tool that comes along. Podcasting may seem like old news in internet time, but there’s a lot of ground to cover, still. Mike Manuel (hosting a Meetup event called Third Thursday) wants to do what most communicators need to, at this point –share insights and implement projects around social media that would benefit clients.

Continue reading

Podcasts and commute time

I have a long commute, so podcasts have come to my rescue, big time. I have been mulling over the possibility of being able to download content on the move. I would like to add that to Kevin Dugan’s hope that by next year, our vehicles could have dard drives with USB ports.

The car stereo would probably adapt to include an simple port for the MP3 player, and a button to fire up and update my preselected feeds from iTunes. Oh, oh. Just for grins I googled the word "icruize" and guess what? There’s an iPod interface called iCruze for $69.95 at this Monster Cable site. The iTunes fix will surely follow.

Continue reading

Bloggers in Singapore censored. What will the neighbors think?

What’s the government of Singapore thinking, taking a leaf from it’s big neighbor that has a policy about banned words in blogs, and shuts down other dissident blogs?

News just out: that there’s a ‘temporary ban’ on political blogs with the elections around the corner. I like to see how the BBC and others cover this one, after the coverage Google and MSN got about their filtering, especially the former’s ‘hard compromise‘  with China.

Continue reading

United Airline’s miscommunication can cost ya

I used to root for United airlines a lot, because of
some great experiences flying Ted from Phoenix and, of course for the domestic leg of a long haul
to Asia every 2 years. When United filed for bankruptcy, I
even switched from Southwest, my company’s preference, just because some of us
love the idea of having more choices…

Today that changed. Just beause someone forgot to
tell me (and my 81 year old mother) that United had a new policy about baggage
weight. Oh well, maybe the economy class isn’t of much significance. I write a
lot about employee communication and internal branding, and this was a case to
behold. Pains me to write about this, but I would like to save some poor
international traveler some grief.

We dropped off my mother at Phoenix airport, on a return flight to Sri Lanka. The ticket agent informed us that we would have to
pay $25 each for both her check-in bags since they were each over 50 pounds
allowance. This was odd. Just last evening, doing a final check, calling
United’s 800 number, I went through the details. Stopovers: Phoenix, Lax, Narita, Singapore, Colombo:
all confirmed. Passenger assistance, confirmed. The final thing I asked was if
the baggage allowance was the same as when she came in –70 pounds. The agent
paused, and then said yes, as this was  an international ticket. I knew
this had to be fine as she had arrived in December last year with bags that
were well over 50 pounds, each. Also, I flew United to Lax last July and
returned in August with with two sixty-five to seventy pound seventy pound
bags. But as frequent fliers always do, we ask the same old questions from the
agent on the phone, just to be sure. To us, they are the airline. Not the ads.
Not the brochures, but the invisible person thousands of miles away who give
you the feeling that everything is ok when you put down the phone.

But all was not Ok when I placed that call.

Mysteriously, United had changed its baggage
policy and not communicated this to us.

I have more back up: Two weeks ago, I stopped at Sky
harbor airport to check on my mom’s ticket as she had confirmed return dates
with a travel agent in Sri Lanka after she got here, and this was not reflected on
her ticket. The agent kindly printed me the new return itinerary, and said even
this was not necassary as her details were all updated in the system. Then too,
I asked how much baggage allowance, and got the same answer: seventy pounds.
Yes, all was OK when I left the building.

This morning, when I brought this to the attention of the counter agent, he
would have none of it, and started getting rude. I was hit with the famous
‘company policy’ stuff, and the fact that all airlines now only allowed 50
pounds. (He may be right. But FYI: we also dropped off someone last evening catching a British Airways flight, and her
bags were 70 pounds each. The web site confirms this. I told him this, but it surely did not help the situation.*)

When I said this was United’s mistake –giving me the
wrong information on the phone, he got rude and said he could not deal with me
anymore –asking my mother to go and stand at the next counter to be served by
someone else. She’s 81 years old, for goodness sake. This was not the way I
wanted her to leave the country. I can be sure she will not be on United the next
time.

I did check this afternoon, and sure, that ‘policy’ is on the United web
site. But does that become the de facto B-to-C communication channel? Is
everyone who flies an airline suposed to hop over to their web site and check
all the details of the flight, just in case the nice lady on the phone got it
wrong? What if you were to apply this to another industry? What if you had a
travel agent to book you into the MGM in Vegas and when you get there, the
person at the counter tells you that your room now costs fifty bucks more
because of a company policy your travel agent hadn’t been alerted to? What if
you rented a car from Avis for a weekend at a certain cost (quoted on the phone)
and when you brought the car back on Sunday, you were slapped with an extra
charge for not getting the car washed –a new policy only posted on the company
web site? Should you feel guilty for not having checked the Avis web site
sometime between Friday and Sunday?

My stand on all this is simple: the person
on the phone is the final frontier. The true face of the company. Undermine
him/her and what you have left is an empty shell. We travel with, dine in, buy
from or subscribe to brands because of the people within. (The people who
listen, that is) not the text on the pOlicy page of the web site.

My mom’s on the long flight right
now. Hope she experiences an ounce of the ‘friendly skies’ hospitality –not
available on the ground, as of this morning, here in Phoenix.

*I can go on about the chap at the counter
(and how there was disagreement with the other staff about how much to charge
us) but that is not the purpose of this post.

Continue reading

The advertising-meets technology headache. PVR’s and declining TV audiences

What are advertisers thinking? Or tearing their hair about? The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) is a body of more than 350 members, and this includes all the brand names that advertise nationally and globally.

Of about twenty committees, almost all of them list as ‘prevalent topics’ things like media and audience measurement, ROI, Integrated Marketing Communications, optimization, addressable TV, and PVR’s (personal video recorders.)

As can be expected, the ‘advertising’ committee and the ‘new technologies’ committee appear very keen on the issues of audience measurement, optimization, and TiVo. So if you were to read between the bullet points, you can see that the migration of advertising from the mainstream media to online opens up a lot of concerns, and a brand new set of needs.

I thought it was interesting that while TiVo was mentioned many times, another brand that is causing a lot of ripples in Madison Avenue and Hollywood was not mentioned: iTunes. Nor was YouTube, or MySpace. Hmmm.

But that is not to say they are not concerned. I clicked around and found that the new tech committee is in fact keeping an open ear for how other brands –I mean issues— such as Google, AOL, and Novartis can shed some light. The latter does not have a migraine-inducing ‘platform’ like PVRs or RSS, but the ANA was interested in the use of an ‘advergame’ called Zone Quest. In case you are wondering, Zone Quest is described as “a fun way to remind you of the importance of making healthy lifestyle choices to keep your blood pressure ‘in the zone’.”

Why am I interested in this? I come across tons of stories that deal with how poorly advertisers are responding to the emerging media, and how unprepared they are to meet the onslaught of the technologies arriving every day that circumvent advertising. They are indeed turning the ship around, allocating large portions of theie media budgets to online strategies. They are quite miffed by TV, and are ‘very dissatisfied’ with upfronts. This was from a survey of ANA members in 2004.

Imagine what they must think two years later…

Continue reading

The world is flat, even in marketing

Jonah Bloom’s column in Ad Age makes an important point, commenting on how the Net changes, and not just replaces traditional media and marketing. He is right. Convergence and Search are like two big tornadoes touching down on media and marketing.

He did not deal with the shift to mobile, however, which is not a separate tornado, but one that will define the path it takes.

Speaking of mobile, I listened to a Deloitte podcast this morning about Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) where they talk of how digitization and fragmentation are forcing marketers to realize that they "need to to live where your customers are" –even if it means creating their own media space via a virtual network. Sainsbury’s, the grocery store in the UK, for instance has Sainsbury’s Mobile that is more than a pre-paid phone; it is there to drive store traffic, they point out.

Mobile devices, likewise will change the way other media operate, and how marketers and customers connect with each other. Why sink a few hundred thousand dollars to put up your ad on network TV, when you can host it for afraction of the cost on a server, and get people to stream it to their mobile phone? Not that television hasn’t thought about this already. Ever heard of the ESPN mobile phone? Another MVNO. Their line, ‘Life will never get in the way of your sports again" should be translated (for media and advertising types) as "distribution should never get in the way of your content again."

This is Friedman’s flat-earth theory, with media ramifications.

Continue reading

Freedom to Connect

This conference is worth watching. Called F2C: Freedom to Connect 2006, it is based on the assumption that the Freedom to Connect falls into the same category as Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion and Assembly.

"Each of these freedoms is related to the others and depends on the others, but stands distinct. Freedom to Connect, too, depends on the other four but carries its own meaning."

It’s about technology and policy, but as it is becoming so clear now, connectivity tips the balance of power toward consumers, and the outcome of a conference like this will make the powers that be very, very scared. The electronic democracy is just waking up.

Continue reading

Logos as postage stamps

If you’ve ever used a service from PhotoStamps.com you’ll know that one of the no-nos in that service was that you couldn’t create a perfectly legal  0.39 cents postage stamp with a company logo. (They also disallowed anything obscene, offensive, pornographic, libelous …even convicted criminals or politicians, celebrities etc.)

It was great for ‘vanity’ stamps of your family, or favorite photo. It was great for companies promoting some icon or idea. I had contacted PhotoStamps twice and they  first said no to a stamp-logo, but then when they said they printed it, the order never arrived. Perhaps it was their way of enforcing the rule. Hopefully that wrinkle will be removed.

There’s news that the Post office has approved the use of commeccial images for stamps. Zazzle.com is one company who does it. It’s $16.99 for a sheet of 20 stamps. You could get the many denominations apart from the 0.39 cent variety.

Continue reading