Facebook critic calls it fake “theater”

Facebook is being described as many things today, as pundits, marketers, social scientists and educators try to get a handle of what’s going on in this space. Is it the ‘”connective tissue,” or a “social graph,” a resume, or a utility?

New York Times Op-Ed writer Alice Mathias has a different take on all of this, dismissing it as an place that encourages performances and escapism –a time-sucking hangout of the “Fakebook Generation.” Here is how she describes it:

I’ve always thought of Facebook as online community theater. In costumes we customize in a backstage makeup room — the Edit Profile page, where we can add a few Favorite Books or touch up our About Me section — we deliver our lines on the very public stage of friends’ walls or photo albums. And because every time we join a network, post a link or make another friend it’s immediately made visible to others via the News Feed, every Facebook act is a soliloquy to our anonymous audience.

I know we instinctively want to challenge this notion. But wait. Mathias is not some angry pundit –she’s a grad student who’s grown up on the thing. She makes a solid point that’s worth addressing: Networks like FB, she says, make us miss other valuable parts of human interaction. “Dwelling online is a cowardly and utterly enjoyable alternative to real interaction.”

Quotes of the week: 6th October 2007

“People treat the New Marketing like a kid with a twenty-dollar bill at an ice cream parlor. They keep wanting to add more stuff—more candy bits and sprinkles and cream and cherries. The dream is simple: “If we can just add enough of [today’s hot topping], everything will take care of itself.”

Seth Godin on Meatball Mondae, a weekly post about Meatball Sundae, a book on making wise new media choices that will be published in December.

“Guantánamo Bay is the anti-Statue of Liberty.”

Thomas Friedman, on why the US should start exporting hope, not fear.

“Demographics are what media is bought by and what media properties define themselves by … targeting by customer passion rather than demographics can make your marketing messages more relevant.”

Rohit Bhargava, on the need to think outside the demographic.

“The advertising industry can only benefit from an image that’s a lot less country club and a little more Facebook.”

Editorial in Advertising Age, on why the just concluded Advertising Week showcasing veterans, mascots and luminaries has hit a wall.

Citizendium, Mahalo, Wikispaces: alternatives worth looking at

If all you’ve been hearing lately (even here!) is news about Facebook, Google, and Wikipedia, it’s about time to mention some alternatives I’ve been tracking.

Citizendium: a wiki for people who can’t stand the rules of engagement established by Wikipedia’s founders about NPOV or” neutral point of view.” This alternative doesn’t let people use pseudonyms such as “WizardDuck,” and welcomes the general public and experts –meaning those who represent organizations, including professional communicators, PR agencies etc. It has lofty goals, to “soon attempt to unseat Wikipedia.”

Mahalo: The human-powered search engine as it calls itself. “Say goodbye to spam, mediocre content and deceptive sites,” it says, taking a thinly-disguised whack at Google. Search results are built in a “greenhouse” where style guides and part-time guides manage content.

One more alternative if you’re thinking about creating your own Wiki.

WikiSpaces: Despite the goofy logo, it’s an easy to create wiki for any personal project. Just like PBWiki, and Wetpaint, but with a lot more intuitive functions.

Interesting crowdsourcing experiment on radio

I am working on an article on citizen journalism, and came across this experiment being conducted on the Brian Lehrer show on WNYC.

They’re doing a story on price gouging, and put out a call to people to “report” back on the price of three simple items at the grocery store: milk, beer and lettuce. The request went out on Sept 24th, and they have until tomorrow, Oct 4th, to file their reports in, via the web site.
They have to give the following details:

-The prices of these goods
-The neighborhood where you bought them (please give exact address, or at least the block and cross street)
-The name of the supermarket
-Any distinguishing characteristic (e.g. local bodega, high-end retailer, etc.)
-Whether or not you were surprised (yes or no)?

In a previous crowdsourced story in August, they asked listeners to report back on the number of SUVs they saw on their block. See results here. They mapped the data with pin-cushions on a Google map.

A great way to take radio into the web 2.0 era!

FaceBook’s social surveillance

Facebook is on everyone’s agenda. I am attending a 5-part webinar hosted by HigherEd Experts on everything Facebook. It covers a lot of the basics, but Fred Stutzman, a PhD student-turned-lecturer comes at it with a deep understanding of what’s going on in this space, in terms of offline-to-online socialization, identity production, privacy and that tricky beast called “social surveillance.”

What’s that?

It’s a phrase that has its origins in deep surveillance methods that include location monitoring and data mining. Which is what social networks have a potential to do, when you think about it. Students are using social networks to do more than upload photos of their dorm. They keep tabs on their circle of friends in a form of benign surveillance.

Because of the rapid shift in demographics, there seems to be two Facebooks separated by an invisible line. Tread carefully when crossing over from your domain into theirs. Last year, a group calling themselves “Students against Facebook” created a sort of a backlash – using Facebook! – against its tracking/surveillance feature.

Burma horror seeps out via social media

“And it’s true we are immune
When fact is fiction and TV reality.
And today the millions cry
We eat and drink while tomorrow they die.”

Journalism in the age of social media has moved along at a fast clip since, say, blog reporting after the tsunami of 2004. The news this week out of Burma of the beatings, protests and killing of the Japanese journalist, Kenji Nagai (yesterday) have all been captured and transmitted via social media at an amazing pace.

Yesterday, I noted the appearance of a Facebook protest group (grown since by more than 500 members.) Today, there is a BBC report on YouTube, that is available on several blogs, and online newspapers capturing the horrible shooting of Mr. Nagai.

There’s a Flickr image where people have posted comments and links to the video and news reports –one uses the U2 lyrics above.

And the best instance of citizen journalism out of Burma is this blog, where the author is uploading images probably taken on a mobile phone, with commentary. A word of caution: some images are graphic.

The person is obviously risking his/her life to do this, using a proxy server. Today’s message: “Now the internet is back but it is difficult to use proxy server.” On the right side of the blog, a text chat area has someone imploring another to “pls tell my brother who can use internet , abt not to enter blogger page without bypass, i think they r tacking who use those websites.”

YouTube. Flickr. Blogs. Proxy servers. Traditional media. Cell phone photo-journalism and people taking a lot of risk to get information out. That in spite of the age old tactic, the media censorship.

Using Flickr photos: is it social media’s carte blanche?

Interesting story of a controversial use of someone’s Flickr photo by Virgin Mobile.

AdRants reports that the family of someone is suing Virgin for using his photograph grabbed off Flickr for the ad campaign .

Which brings up the question: is it OK to use/link to someone’s picture because it is out there on a Creative Commons license? Or the larger question: Is the model release form in need of a re-write?

I have put up some of my photos here on my blog, via Flickr. I have not deemed them private, and they fall under the Creative Commons license –meaning they could be used for commercial reasons as long as they attribute the source. But I have to be careful. I don’t use pictures of my friends or family in that album. I know some others do.

CC Chapman (above) for instance, the epitome of all things in the new media space, a huge advocate of the commons and networking has loads of pictures up there. Robert Scoble’s photos of family and colleagues are everywhere.

Note, I am not copying or uploading this image of CC. I am simply linking to the URL, using the WordPress “insert image here” field. (I’ve previously used the image upload feature, but apart from it being cumbersome, it’s never seemed fair to copy someone’s logo or image onto my hard drive and upload it without their permission.)

But to get back to Virgin, consider the medium the campaign is promoting: phones. Virgin’s agency could not have been ignorant of the copyright envelope they were pushing. My guess is that it half expected this to happen and like all things Virgin, decided it was just “doing a Branson.”

And just to capture a delicious irony of how a Flickr lawsuit could end up, there’s a picture of a settlement check one photographer received after suing a company that had used her Flickr photo. Yes, that settlement and the check is on Flickr !

On Grammar Girl, content is queen

I listen to a podcast of one of the driest subjects on earth, grammar. But what makes Grammar Girl, so extremely listenable /valuable /addictive is a lesson for a lot of marketing communications that’s too self conscious. This short, no-frills podcast never reveals the person behind the mike –Mignon Fogerty — who interestingly is from our neck of the woods –Gilbert Arizona.

But I bring this up because of another reason. It’s a good example of why you should pay attention to content, and not get too distracted with format and style. Grammar Girl has no well-produced intros and outros (the intro is simple and memorable.) Just riveting content. She opens with three words that becomes her de-facto signature, “Grammar girl here,” and leaps straight into the topic.

Topics are those you may be too embarrassed to ask about (but rather look it up on Wikipedia) such as when and how to use an ellipsis … the proper use of bring/take, and things you never new existed (“eggcorns“)! She also responds to reader queries, and comes across as the person next door, rather than some snooty English major or language guru. Give it a listen and you’ll see what I mean.