What did we learn from the Writers’ Strike?

No matter what you write, or where you publish, your content is going to migrate online.

The long and winding road of the Writers Guild of America has now come to a yield sign. They signed a contract with the studios on the basis of residuals that will be paid to them, some of which only begin after 2010. But they did have a qualified win.

Interestingly, this week, another group is negotiating how their “work” might be remunerated. Faculty members at Harvard University are voting on on a proposal that will allow the university to push their scholarship through online distribution methods online for the princely sum of … free! They could opt-out, of course.

And also this week, BurrellesLuce has called for a a copyright compliance standard for PR firms that may otherwise unwittingly violate intellectual property rights when they distributes publishers’ content. It calls for charging “a small royalty” for delivering the online and print stories it selects for clients.

If we have learned something from the Writers’ strike, it’s the value of (and price we should put on) content. We have sipped the “information wants to be free” cocktail too long and have never questioned what the real price of “free” is.

OK, so YouTube wants to be free, and the New York Times online wants to be free, but writers need to be paid and nurtured, and have a motivation to go after or craft the content that needs brainstorming, travel, teamwork and publishers who appreciate their endeavor. It depends on the definition of “small royalty,” but and it ought to be settled across a table not a picket line.
If not, everything from research to sitcoms will be diluted –to refill our freebie cocktails, maybe.

Old Media vs New: right debate, wrong question

“Speech over the radio is as likely as a man jumping over the moon.” – Thomas Edison

I am always reminded of ‘predictions’ like this when someone tells me questions such as “Will anyone read books on cell phones?” or “Will laptops ever become obsolete?” The problem with questions like this is that they frame the debate wrong, or to put it a better way, we frame the question with words that relate to industries that are being redefined even as we speak. Books are not always paper-based, when you consider audio books, eBooks and now books on readers such as Amazon’s Kindle.

In the famous debate (which won’t go away) over film vs digital, Roger Clark, a photographer, tells us the question really is a debate over “film versus electronic sensors.”

In the debate over whether blogs amount to journalism, we get distracted by trying to apply what we know about them -are they both ‘filters,’ or ‘gatekeepers?’ — because both blogs and journalism are changing, and the question becomes irrelevant. You can compare Kevin Sites, with say Brian Williams if the debate was simply one about “Should journalists blog?” but that’s the wrong question. Rather it should be “How best should journalists tell their story?” Sites, if you recall worked for the usual suspects NBC, CNN and ABC, but was last working for Yahoo! (Which re-frames the question, the Yahoo Vs Microsoft issue notwithstanding, “Is Yahoo a news organization?”)

Which brings me back to the “speech over radio” issue. Mobile devices have allowed us to accomplish the moon-jump that Edison though impossible, and it is taking us into new territory. We could debate forever old questions such as “will cell phones replace land lines,” but the real question is whether mobile devices (that may or may not happen to be phones) change conversations. Already micro-blogging, mobile search, and photography are seeing new models emerge thanks to these devices.

At this week’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, actor-director-indie film guru Robert Redford will speak at an event called Mobile Backstage. His topic is about the “Fourth screen” as a medium for filmmakers. In case you’re wondering what this term means, consider this. Until recently there was a lot of talk about mobile devices being the “Third screen” –after television and the computer. Everyone got very excited about the 3-screen possibilities. Today we are talking of a different set of screens for the entertainment industry: the cinema screen, television and the gaming console were the first three. Mobile devices are the fourth.

From a communications perspective then, put them all together and you’ve got 5 screens, and you could configure them any way to suit your campaign or outreach program. Content will always be fluid, media will always be non-linear, so let’s not get locked in by asking the wrong question. The Mobile World Congress’ theme is “ideas in motion” –not platforms in motion!

Cult of the amateur: provocative idea, wrong lens

If you loved Wikinomics, you’ve got to read Andrew Sheen’s “The cult of the amateur.” It forces your brain to take a compare the seductive arguments about knowledge democratization, and the decline of social values as a result of user-generated content.

On the face of it Sheen is a cross between Vincent Bryan Key (Subliminal Seduction) and Neil Postman (Amusing ourselves to death) both warning about the dangerous trends in advertising (in 1974), and television culture (in 1986) respectively.

He sees the internet as the slippery slope of literary, moral and cultural standards, and seems to try hard to relate it to amateurism. Indeed, the struggle between old media and its receptacles, versus new media and the infinite pores out of which this new content is flowing is easy to cast as one between the good guys and the baddies.

But it’s not, and I discuss why, here in my detailed review of the book, at ValleyPRblog.

“Flickr Commons” needs your help

This should have been included in my previous post.

Flickr has partnered with the Library of Congress in something called the Flickr Commons. The LOC has team allowed the photo sharing site to use 1,500 of its photographs (from its 1 million page catalog) on Flickr.

The more important part of this is the fact that the LOC is asking for your collaboration –to tag the photos.

This particular photograph is from a series from the Bain News Service, from 1910-1912.

Thanks for Hyperbio for this.

Live Blogging Police Officers – new job title?

New media has made us wear a lot of new hats. It’s also created new job titles such as CBO (Chief Blogging Officer), Manager of Digital Convergence, and Virtual World Bureau Chief (the chap from Reuters, hanging out in Second Life.)

But who’s going to be the one managing (as in snooping on) live blogging at NCAA games? They announced that there will be certain times blogging will be permitted during games. Does that mean there will be a posse armed with wi-fi detectors and binoculars roaming the stands to see who’s thumb typing on a smart phone?

What to look for in social media in 2008

After the mixed bag of social media triumphs and hiccups last year, here are some positive things to watch out for in the new year:

1. Coming clean. Wal-mart’s site, Working Families for Walmart, has moved the project in house, out of PR Agency Edelman. You may recall astroturfing issue over the original fake blog, or flog.

2. Publishing and Crowdsourcing. The book on Crowdsourcing by Jeff Howe (to be published by Random House early 2008) used the concept of wisdom of the crowds to create a book jacket.They call it ‘coversourcing‘ and you can participate. Entries close on 10 February 2008.

3. Intranet makeovers. Social networks have given organizations a taste of how to (un)manage employee communications. Marc Wright has a great how to article in the Jan-Feb issue of CW (membership required) about how to dip ones toes into web 2.0 with what organizations already have: the staff directory, video library, a project wiki and a user group.

4. Social media knowledge distribution: Combine the spark generated by wireless book readers such as Kindle and the trends such as the OpenCourseWare initiative (by MIT,) and it is entirely possible for knowledge industries to give users new ways to access content.

5. Niche marketing to cell phones. This is a wild card. A lot depends on how much of social media nodes and features cell phone carriers incorporate into handsets and service plans. Even without their help, as we have more points of access via Bluetooth and WiFi, we could be using our phones to do more. We could ‘attend’ events targeted at small groups, and participate/collaborate live via phones rather than laptops.

Things that made us go “huh?” in 2007

Oh, what a year it was. Between freedom of information faux pas, a fake press conference, and a shiny new new object from Apple, we obsessed about these stories:

The amazing role that social media played in letting the world know about the violent reaction to the peaceful protests in Burma, in September

Larry Craig, Republican senator for Iowa, accused of soliciting sex in an airport bathroom, pleads guilty, but then attempts to deny charges.

Southwest Airlines gets a passenger to change his T-shirt because of it has a slogan that could be considered rude. It also gets another passenger to get off a plane for wearing a too-revealing mini skirt. Southwest later apologized and called launched mini skirt fares.

Lisa Novak, the astronaut who drove across the country in a diaper, is arrested.

Strumpette, the PR blogger who postured about PR, resigns, and re-emerges.

FEMA holds a fake news conference after the California fires, using employees posing as journalists.

Apple fans camp outside electronics stores to be the first to buy the $600 iPhone.

Soon after this, Apple warns iPhone customers it would cripple it should they try hacking it.

Wal-mart is investigated on charges that an employee could have been spying on text messages and phone conversations between a New York Times reporter and a PR employees.

Jeff Jarvis begins to say nice things about Dell.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for Beacon, a feature that would have shared users’ personal information with others without their opting in.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio arrests the owners of a newspaper, The New Times, for refusing to submit information about the dates and times and other information about visitors to its web site. The case was later dropped.

Comcast responds to the “Comcast Must Die” angst started by Advertising Age columnist (and NPR’s On the Media co-host) Bob Garfield, saying “real world developments” such as becoming the largest cable provider makes it difficult to keep promises.

John McCain responds to a New Hampshire high school student’s question about his age with “thanks for the question, you little jerk!”

A blog calling itself Fake Steve Jobs, is tracked down to senior editor of Forbes, Daniel Lyons.

British rock band Radiohead releases its album In Rainbows online, for free, with a prompt to downloaders to pay what they want.

Earlier in the year, Prince gave away a 10-track album, Planet Earth, free through the ‘old media’ a.k.a. newspapers, The Mail on Sunday.

The protest by Londoners over the ‘ugly’ 2012 Olympic logo. The wisdom of the crowds was ignored. The logo remained unchanged.

Barry Bonds if pleads “not guilty.” Don Imus is fired by CBS, and returns to radio via an ABC affiliate.

 

Press kit not a sales kit in social media world

Great post today by Charlotte Risch, a co-editor of ValleyPRBlog.

How many times have you called up a company for details about a product or service, to be told something like “we don’t have a press kit, but I could send you a PDF of something we took to a trade show…”

If only the Social Media NewsRoom had a lot more takers.

GM’s newsroom looks like a blog, with Flickr, Delicious, and YouTube links.

The image on the left of a 2007 concept car, the Beat, is being pulled off the Flickr site that has some 152 images.

What better way to provide the media with photos, instead of taking months to create and maintain a separate photo archive.

Quotes for the week ending 1 Dec, 2007

” ‘Buy American’ and ‘Long Tail’ are just so last year; marketers are all about good old-fashioned customer satisfaction and retention.”

Advertising Age story on Seth Godin being picked as the top business guru, over Steve Jobs and Malcolm Gladwell.

“GoDaddy will go ahead with Super Bowl ad.”

Article in Arizona Republic stating that the domain name registrar will once again air a risque ad during the Super Bowl, a tactic it has done for two years now.

“Inventing a way to charge people for free stuff? Now that’s what I call a technological breakthrough.”

Technology reviewer Brian Collins, writing in The Sunday Times, UK, about Amazon’s e-book reader, Kindle, that charges users $14.99 a month to read newspapers, and 0.99 cents a month to read blogs on the device.

“The chilling effect on expensive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America.”

Stephen Crocker, Federal magistrate, in a June ruling against the subpoena for Amazon.com records on a mail and wire fraud case. Reported this week on CNN.com. The court docs were unsealed last week.

“Journalists and PR people have to hold each other responsible.”

Barry Kluger, former VP of Communications for Prodigy Inc. and senior exec at MTV, at a lecture at Arizona State University.

PR needs to do its own PR

George Simpson, a columnist for Media Post’s Marketing Daily added this to the PR debate, with some harsh words.

“Show me a child who says “I want to grow up and spend 15 hours a day writing meaningless press releases, begging for placement and swallowing my pride with arrogant writers”–and I will show you a child the school authorities should keep away from m-rated video games, listening to Metallica, or obtaining a gun permit.”

Never mind that Simpson cites stats such as this: 90% of B2B reporters use news releases as sources for their stories.

Chris Anderson’s post has somehow become a polarizing event, with the PR haters on one side of the spectrum taking hugs whacks at much more than clueless practitioners spamming journalists. (Someone commented that Anderson has no right to be offended. WIRED mag has been spamming him for years!)

Amazingly, the PR industry response has been weak. PRSA has published results of a study that very impressively states how journalists largely depend on PR for their stories –the source that Simpson uses. But while it has responded to other issues such as the recent fake news conference held by FEMA, the PRSA has not issued a statement on the Anderson problem. It’s been left to PR practitioners to stand up for what PR is really about.

How long must we wait?