Those new Apple ads mining the Walt Mossberg connection

An Apple campaign pitting Macs against PCs is a lot like the Mac itself, stylish and simple. It’s a good example of how to be convincing without ad copy butting into the story. Two people in front of a camera exchanging barbs in a way typical Mac and PC people would.

In the ad, ‘Network,’ there’s great body language, a lot of unpolished, but authentic ‘waitwaitwaitwaits’ and ‘aaaahs.’ The one on ‘Restarting’ has both of them in conversation, but Mr. PC’s speech freezes mid-sentence, and he has to restart. Much to the amusement of our Mac fella who wanders off camera to get help for his friend, from IT. 

The only polished ‘copy’ comes out in the Wall Street Journal ad –and that when Mr. PC reads off Mossberg’s column. Walt Mossberg, in case you aren’t into his technology column, is someone who’s opinion makes or breaks a product. No surprise then that this campaign is also running on the front page of the Wall Street Journal’s online edition.

There are 6 versions. You can see them all here.

Continue reading

Quotes of the week:

"(Customers) expect it all to be included because to them data is the main event and voice is just another thing they do with their phone"  Helio CEO, Sky Dayton, in a Reuter’s story

"The future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed."  Author William Gibson

"if you hold a political stunt news conference at a gas station and then depart in an alternative fuel automobile, you should drive further than one block."
Mike Swenson
, on House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who drove away in a Hydrogen fuel vehicle from a news conference at a gas station, but then got into an SUV.

Continue reading

WOM and citizen marketing: companies are getting it

John Cass’s comments on GlaxoSmithkline’s use of word of mouth, is worth reading. It’s at Backbone Media.

Steve Rubel’s commenting on American Express engaging in citizen marketing, brings up something that underlines this trend: opening up, warts and all. Transparency in marketing and PR is talked about a lot. Putting it into practice, getting out there and opening a few windows is hard.

Continue reading

Branding has left the building

Brand building has moved out of home office, and is now online. This is where real consumer dialogs are taking place. As a marketing communications manager I have to recognize and listen to the voices ‘out there’ which are more compelling and interesting. If we tap into the C-to-C channels, we’ll find much more going on there than anything in our B-to-B or B-to-C world.

The online world is getting a lot of attention, but how convinced are the layers? Steve Rubel’s observation today that even TV execs don’t seem to really get it, parallel’s an article in Ad Age I saw in February, that says Madison Avenue "needs to figure out emerging media –fast– or lose billions of dollars to someone who will."

The story featured Verizon Wireless marketing VP lashing out at the old way of buying media. Hugely reminiscent of Jim Stengel’s stern warning to the ad community in 2003. Which makes me wonder, how many warnings does it take to to recognize that branding, distribution, and audience interaction is not what it used to be even two years ago?

As Kenneth Musante puts it, everyone, including the TV folks, are in the collective big-toe-in-the water stage of the game. And while they are doing this, the YouTubes of this world are crashing the marketing and television party, aren’t they?

Continue reading

Verizon’s advertising faux pas

The story of sidewalk advertising by Verizon reminds me of IBM’s famous use of ‘Peace, love and Linux’ campaign in 2001 using sidewalk chalk. When will companies learn that you can’t take ‘guerilla’ tactics to public places and not get rapped on your knuckles.

Or maybe, I am missing the point entirely –the piurpose of such a move may be to get rapped on your knuckles, and thereby get more stories on the campaign in circulation. IBM’s chalk tactic was deemed graffiti. MSN, went beyond the sidewalk and stuck cutouts of butterflies.

Verizon’s fine of $1,050 is like loose change in a campaign warchest. Someday someone will compute that the Google juice gained from seven infractions (fined at the rate of $150 each), may be well worth doing it many times over. Not to be atempted in San Francisco, for sure. IBM was fined over a $100,000, four years ago.

Continue reading

Consumer generated advertising has mixed results

In this consumer-in-the-driving seat world of marketing, the idea of getting consumers to design their own ads is a facinating one whose time has come and gone and come again. Even before the Net, I recall (somewhere in London, i believe) a tactic where McDonald’s allowed customers to design their own coupon. Hand drawn ones.

More recently, Converse has been solicting user content –not commercials, it says, but ‘films.’ That’s a 24-second film, which um, sounds like a commercial, to me. Just add an intro and end frame. There’s more about this on Cory Confetti’s blog, User Generated, about an antiperspirant ad for Ban, and user generated commercials.

So this story about Chevy Taho, in the New York Times, adds a new twist. When a company opens itself up to consumer ‘feedback’ of this nature, albeit ads, it has to expect opinions from all kinds of people –customers and those who aren’t exactly fans. The rules on the Chevy site (co-branded with The Apprentice) specify that the submitted ad must contain 5 or more clips from what has been provided. But still that leave enough room for people to express themselved.

Jackie Huba and Ben McConnell, the very interesting Church of the Customer folks, aptly call this a game, not real UGC. Why play this game and ask customers to do the work that you anyway pay an ad agency? One word: engagement. Marketers have grown weary of eyeballs. They want customers to take the reigns –even of their creative. Agencies must love it –creating advertising that solicits advertising.

Continue reading

United Airline’s miscommunication can cost ya

I used to root for United airlines a lot, because of
some great experiences flying Ted from Phoenix and, of course for the domestic leg of a long haul
to Asia every 2 years. When United filed for bankruptcy, I
even switched from Southwest, my company’s preference, just because some of us
love the idea of having more choices…

Today that changed. Just beause someone forgot to
tell me (and my 81 year old mother) that United had a new policy about baggage
weight. Oh well, maybe the economy class isn’t of much significance. I write a
lot about employee communication and internal branding, and this was a case to
behold. Pains me to write about this, but I would like to save some poor
international traveler some grief.

We dropped off my mother at Phoenix airport, on a return flight to Sri Lanka. The ticket agent informed us that we would have to
pay $25 each for both her check-in bags since they were each over 50 pounds
allowance. This was odd. Just last evening, doing a final check, calling
United’s 800 number, I went through the details. Stopovers: Phoenix, Lax, Narita, Singapore, Colombo:
all confirmed. Passenger assistance, confirmed. The final thing I asked was if
the baggage allowance was the same as when she came in –70 pounds. The agent
paused, and then said yes, as this was  an international ticket. I knew
this had to be fine as she had arrived in December last year with bags that
were well over 50 pounds, each. Also, I flew United to Lax last July and
returned in August with with two sixty-five to seventy pound seventy pound
bags. But as frequent fliers always do, we ask the same old questions from the
agent on the phone, just to be sure. To us, they are the airline. Not the ads.
Not the brochures, but the invisible person thousands of miles away who give
you the feeling that everything is ok when you put down the phone.

But all was not Ok when I placed that call.

Mysteriously, United had changed its baggage
policy and not communicated this to us.

I have more back up: Two weeks ago, I stopped at Sky
harbor airport to check on my mom’s ticket as she had confirmed return dates
with a travel agent in Sri Lanka after she got here, and this was not reflected on
her ticket. The agent kindly printed me the new return itinerary, and said even
this was not necassary as her details were all updated in the system. Then too,
I asked how much baggage allowance, and got the same answer: seventy pounds.
Yes, all was OK when I left the building.

This morning, when I brought this to the attention of the counter agent, he
would have none of it, and started getting rude. I was hit with the famous
‘company policy’ stuff, and the fact that all airlines now only allowed 50
pounds. (He may be right. But FYI: we also dropped off someone last evening catching a British Airways flight, and her
bags were 70 pounds each. The web site confirms this. I told him this, but it surely did not help the situation.*)

When I said this was United’s mistake –giving me the
wrong information on the phone, he got rude and said he could not deal with me
anymore –asking my mother to go and stand at the next counter to be served by
someone else. She’s 81 years old, for goodness sake. This was not the way I
wanted her to leave the country. I can be sure she will not be on United the next
time.

I did check this afternoon, and sure, that ‘policy’ is on the United web
site. But does that become the de facto B-to-C communication channel? Is
everyone who flies an airline suposed to hop over to their web site and check
all the details of the flight, just in case the nice lady on the phone got it
wrong? What if you were to apply this to another industry? What if you had a
travel agent to book you into the MGM in Vegas and when you get there, the
person at the counter tells you that your room now costs fifty bucks more
because of a company policy your travel agent hadn’t been alerted to? What if
you rented a car from Avis for a weekend at a certain cost (quoted on the phone)
and when you brought the car back on Sunday, you were slapped with an extra
charge for not getting the car washed –a new policy only posted on the company
web site? Should you feel guilty for not having checked the Avis web site
sometime between Friday and Sunday?

My stand on all this is simple: the person
on the phone is the final frontier. The true face of the company. Undermine
him/her and what you have left is an empty shell. We travel with, dine in, buy
from or subscribe to brands because of the people within. (The people who
listen, that is) not the text on the pOlicy page of the web site.

My mom’s on the long flight right
now. Hope she experiences an ounce of the ‘friendly skies’ hospitality –not
available on the ground, as of this morning, here in Phoenix.

*I can go on about the chap at the counter
(and how there was disagreement with the other staff about how much to charge
us) but that is not the purpose of this post.

Continue reading

The world is flat, even in marketing

Jonah Bloom’s column in Ad Age makes an important point, commenting on how the Net changes, and not just replaces traditional media and marketing. He is right. Convergence and Search are like two big tornadoes touching down on media and marketing.

He did not deal with the shift to mobile, however, which is not a separate tornado, but one that will define the path it takes.

Speaking of mobile, I listened to a Deloitte podcast this morning about Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) where they talk of how digitization and fragmentation are forcing marketers to realize that they "need to to live where your customers are" –even if it means creating their own media space via a virtual network. Sainsbury’s, the grocery store in the UK, for instance has Sainsbury’s Mobile that is more than a pre-paid phone; it is there to drive store traffic, they point out.

Mobile devices, likewise will change the way other media operate, and how marketers and customers connect with each other. Why sink a few hundred thousand dollars to put up your ad on network TV, when you can host it for afraction of the cost on a server, and get people to stream it to their mobile phone? Not that television hasn’t thought about this already. Ever heard of the ESPN mobile phone? Another MVNO. Their line, ‘Life will never get in the way of your sports again" should be translated (for media and advertising types) as "distribution should never get in the way of your content again."

This is Friedman’s flat-earth theory, with media ramifications.

Continue reading

iPods in schools spread the word

More iPods are appearing in schools -as a faculty requirement. See this story on how a Georgia State University has one history lecturer requires that students download 39 films on video iPods "so she doesn’t have to spend class time screening the movies."

What an amazing marketing and PR coup for iPod, especuially a story with references such as how the faculty wants to find "more strategic uses for the popular digital music and video players" and how staff and faculty have formed a team called "iDreamers."

The school has some 400 college owned iPods in use. A lot like Macs in the early days, right?

Continue reading

Tower Records into Podcasting

In Dave Kusek and Gerd Leonards book, The Future of Music, the authors practically warn music companies that if they don’t embrace customers and respect artists, they will be steamrolled into the digital landfill.

This story in Forbes, about Tower Records indicates that some companies have got the message. It is a podcast service called TowerPod.com that allows listeners to create podcasts  and audio shows using music from the site.

The company will pick up revenue from advertising it will slot into the podcasts –and share the revenue with those who created the podcasts! Marketing folk will obviously see an opening here to (a) buy these advertising slots, and (b) create their own podcasts since it opens a new distribution channel with strong brand recognition –alongside iTunes, of course.

The book’s main thesis, ‘music like water’ talks of music returning to a service once again, after being trapped in the productized format, the CD, tape and vinyl. I can see podcasting as just the tip of the spear of content distribution and sponsored communication. It will leap into newer formats when mobile phones (our future MP3 players) become the interface for such music services.

Continue reading